Meaning: The quote by David Korten touches upon the nuanced distinction between internationalism and economic globalization, particularly within the context of progressive thought in the United States. To fully grasp the implications of this quote, it is essential to understand the concepts of internationalism and economic globalization and how they are perceived within the progressive movement.

Internationalism refers to a political principle that advocates cooperation and solidarity between nations. It emphasizes the importance of global unity, mutual respect, and collaboration to address common challenges such as human rights, environmental sustainability, and social justice. Internationalism is often associated with efforts to promote peace, diplomacy, and international institutions that facilitate dialogue and cooperation among nations.

On the other hand, economic globalization refers to the increasing interconnectedness of national economies through trade, investment, and the free flow of capital, goods, and services across borders. This phenomenon is driven by technological advancements, liberalization of trade policies, and the growing influence of multinational corporations in shaping the global economy. Economic globalization has led to the expansion of global supply chains, the rise of transnational corporations, and the integration of financial markets on a global scale.

David Korten, as an activist and scholar, prompts us to consider the distinctions between these two concepts. In the context of the United States, progressives are increasingly recognizing the differences between internationalism and economic globalization. This observation alludes to the critical examination of how global interconnectedness, particularly in economic terms, impacts the values and goals of the progressive movement.

The distinction drawn by Korten suggests that while internationalism embodies the principles of cooperation, solidarity, and mutual benefit among nations, economic globalization often prioritizes profit, market expansion, and corporate interests. For progressives in the US, this differentiation is significant as it highlights the need to discern between the positive aspects of global collaboration and the potential detrimental effects of unchecked economic integration.

In recent decades, the intensification of economic globalization has raised concerns among progressives regarding issues such as income inequality, labor rights, environmental degradation, and the erosion of national sovereignty. The prioritization of corporate profits and the pursuit of market-driven policies have been critiqued for exacerbating social and economic disparities both within and between countries. As a result, many progressives have become increasingly wary of the unchecked expansion of economic globalization and its potential to undermine the principles of social justice and environmental sustainability.

Moreover, the distinction between internationalism and economic globalization underscores the complexity of navigating global interdependence while upholding progressive values. It requires a careful examination of how economic policies, trade agreements, and corporate practices impact communities, workers, and the environment both domestically and internationally. This critical assessment is essential for progressives to advocate for policies that prioritize human welfare, equity, and environmental stewardship within the framework of global cooperation.

In conclusion, David Korten's quote serves as a thought-provoking insight into the evolving perspectives of progressives in the United States regarding internationalism and economic globalization. It encourages a deeper understanding of the complexities inherent in global interconnectedness and prompts a reevaluation of how economic policies and global integration align with the values of solidarity, justice, and sustainability. By recognizing the differences between these concepts, progressives can better navigate the challenges of a globalized world while advocating for policies that prioritize the well-being of people and the planet.