Meaning: Suzanne LaFollette, an American writer and social critic, made this thought-provoking statement about human rights. The quote challenges the notion of universal human rights and raises important questions about the inclusivity and limitations of the concept of "human" in the context of human rights discourse.

When LaFollette suggests that "Most people, no doubt, when they espouse human rights, make their own mental reservations about the proper application of the word human," she is highlighting the complex and often ambiguous nature of human rights advocacy. The term "human" in human rights is meant to encompass all individuals regardless of race, gender, religion, or other characteristics. However, LaFollette's statement suggests that individuals may interpret and apply the concept of "human" in different ways based on their own biases, prejudices, or cultural influences.

One interpretation of LaFollette's quote is that people may selectively apply human rights to certain groups while excluding or marginalizing others. This can be seen in instances where certain marginalized communities are denied their basic rights due to discrimination, prejudice, or societal norms that do not align with the universal principles of human rights. When individuals or societies make "mental reservations" about who deserves human rights, the concept of universality and equality inherent in human rights becomes compromised.

Another interpretation of LaFollette's statement is that the definition of "human" itself may be subject to interpretation and debate. Throughout history, there have been instances where certain groups of people were considered less than fully human, leading to their systematic oppression and denial of rights. This highlights the malleability of the concept of "human" and the potential for individuals or societies to redefine it based on their own interests or prejudices.

It is important to note that LaFollette's quote was made in the context of her advocacy for women's rights and reproductive freedom. She was a prominent figure in the women's rights movement and a vocal advocate for birth control and reproductive rights. In this context, her statement can be seen as a critique of the selective application of human rights to women, particularly in the realm of reproductive autonomy.

In contemporary times, LaFollette's quote continues to hold relevance as human rights issues remain at the forefront of global discourse. The ongoing struggles for racial equality, LGBTQ+ rights, gender equality, and economic justice all reflect the complexities and nuances inherent in the application of human rights. The quote serves as a reminder that the pursuit of human rights requires constant vigilance against the tendency to selectively apply or redefine the concept of "human" based on biases and prejudices.

In conclusion, Suzanne LaFollette's quote about human rights challenges us to critically examine the inclusivity and limitations of the term "human" in the context of human rights advocacy. It prompts us to consider the ways in which individuals and societies may selectively apply or redefine human rights based on their own biases and prejudices. By grappling with these complexities, we can strive for a more inclusive and equitable understanding and application of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their background or identity.