Meaning: The quote by Christopher Lasch, a prominent historian and social critic, captures a significant shift in the political landscape where the left is perceived to have lost touch with popular opinion, allowing the right to position itself as the party of common sense. This statement reflects a broader trend in contemporary politics where there is a growing disconnect between the traditional left-wing ideology and the sentiments of the general population.

Christopher Lasch was known for his incisive analysis of American society and culture, and his observations about the political dynamics of his time continue to hold relevance in contemporary discourse. In this quote, Lasch highlights the perception that the left has become detached from the concerns and values of the broader population, creating an opportunity for the right to claim the mantle of representing common sense and the interests of the people.

The notion of "popular opinion" is central to Lasch's observation. It suggests that the left, which traditionally espouses progressive and often radical ideas, has become out of sync with the beliefs and attitudes of the general public. This disconnection has allowed the right, which often promotes conservative and traditional values, to position itself as more in tune with the common sense of the people. The implication is that the left's ideas and policies are perceived as out of touch or extreme by the broader population, creating an opening for the right to appeal to a wider audience.

Lasch's characterization of the right as the party of common sense also speaks to the power of framing and rhetoric in political discourse. By presenting itself as the voice of reason and practicality, the right is able to capitalize on the perceived shortcomings of the left and position itself as a more viable and relatable option for the electorate. This framing can be particularly potent in shaping public perception and influencing political outcomes.

Moreover, Lasch's quote invites reflection on the evolving dynamics of political ideologies and their resonance with the public. It raises questions about how the left, historically associated with progressive and inclusive agendas, may have failed to effectively communicate its message and connect with the concerns of ordinary citizens. Meanwhile, the right has been able to leverage this perceived disconnect to cultivate an image of being in touch with the values and priorities of the people.

In contemporary political contexts, Lasch's observation continues to be relevant. The polarization of political discourse, the rise of populist movements, and the shifting dynamics of public opinion all contribute to a complex landscape where the positioning of the left and the right in relation to popular sentiment is a critical factor in shaping the political climate. Lasch's quote serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding and engaging with the perspectives and concerns of the broader population in order to effectively navigate the political terrain.

In conclusion, Christopher Lasch's quote encapsulates a salient observation about the evolving dynamics of political ideologies and their relationship with popular opinion. It underscores the potential consequences of a perceived disconnect between the left and the general public, allowing the right to capitalize on the opportunity to present itself as the party of common sense. This quote prompts a critical examination of the evolving political landscape and the imperative for political movements to effectively engage with and resonate with the sentiments of the broader population.