Meaning: Bill Laswell, a prominent musician, makes a thought-provoking statement about the clash between conventional music and electronica. In this quote, he highlights the tension and resistance that exists within the music industry, as traditional musicians feel threatened by the emergence and growing popularity of electronica. Laswell suggests that there is a lack of recognition and appreciation for electronica as a valuable form of music in comparison to conventional music.

The divide between conventional music and electronica reflects broader debates within the music industry and among music enthusiasts. Conventional music, often associated with genres such as classical, jazz, rock, and pop, has long been established as the mainstream and traditional form of music. It encompasses a wide range of instruments, vocal performances, and musical compositions that have been ingrained in cultural and historical contexts.

On the other hand, electronica represents a newer and more experimental form of music that heavily relies on electronic instruments, digital sound manipulation, and computer-generated beats. This genre has gained momentum in recent decades, particularly with the advancements in technology and the widespread accessibility of electronic music production tools.

The clash between these two musical realms is rooted in differing perceptions of musical authenticity, creativity, and cultural significance. Traditional musicians often view electronica as a departure from the organic and emotive qualities of conventional music, expressing concerns about its perceived lack of skill and artistic depth. In contrast, proponents of electronica argue that it represents a contemporary and innovative approach to music-making, leveraging technology to push the boundaries of sound and composition.

Laswell's assertion that conventional musicians feel threatened by electronica sheds light on the underlying fear of change and disruption within the music industry. The rise of electronica challenges established norms and conventions, posing a potential shift in the power dynamics and commercial viability of different musical styles. As a result, resistance and skepticism towards electronica may arise from a desire to uphold the traditional status quo and protect the legacy of conventional music.

Moreover, the perceived devaluation of electronica compared to conventional music reflects broader issues of hierarchy and elitism within the music industry. Historically, certain genres and styles of music have been privileged and legitimized within institutional settings, while others have been marginalized or overlooked. This dynamic has implications for the recognition, representation, and economic opportunities available to musicians and artists working in different musical spheres.

In the contemporary music landscape, the coexistence of conventional music and electronica has led to hybridization and cross-pollination between the two realms. Many artists and producers are incorporating elements of electronica into conventional genres, blurring the boundaries and creating new sonic landscapes. This fusion of styles has sparked creative collaborations and genre-defying projects that challenge the dichotomy presented in Laswell's quote.

Ultimately, the quote by Bill Laswell serves as a reminder of the complexities and tensions inherent in the evolving music industry. It prompts us to critically examine the dynamics of privilege, resistance to change, and the diverse forms of musical expression that contribute to the richness and diversity of the global music ecosystem.

In conclusion, the quote encapsulates the underlying tensions and power dynamics between conventional music and electronica, inviting us to consider the broader implications for musical innovation, cultural recognition, and artistic validity.