Meaning: This quote by James Laughlin, a renowned poet and the founder of New Directions Publishing, provides insight into the editorial process of compiling an anthology. Laughlin's approach reflects a dedication to authenticity and a rejection of forced thematic constraints in favor of a more organic and intuitive selection process.

Laughlin's statement highlights the absence of a predetermined theme or sequence for the anthology. This approach stands in contrast to the traditional practice of curating anthologies around a specific theme or subject matter. Rather than imposing a thematic framework, Laughlin emphasizes the importance of personal taste and individual preference in the selection process. This approach allows for a more diverse and eclectic collection of works, reflecting the varied interests and inclinations of the editor.

The emphasis on including works that the editor personally likes speaks to the subjective nature of the anthology compilation process. Laughlin's assertion suggests that the anthology is a reflection of the editor's own literary sensibilities and preferences. By including pieces that resonate with him, Laughlin seeks to create a collection that is both authentic and representative of his own literary tastes.

Furthermore, Laughlin's mention of alternating prose and poetry within the anthology underscores the significance of balance and variety in the compilation process. By interweaving different literary forms, the anthology aims to offer a multifaceted and engaging reading experience. This deliberate alternation serves to create a dynamic rhythm and flow within the anthology, catering to a diverse readership with varying literary preferences.

Laughlin's approach to anthology curation aligns with the principles of New Directions Publishing, which has long been associated with promoting avant-garde and innovative literature. The emphasis on personal taste, diversity, and a lack of thematic constraints reflects the publisher's commitment to nurturing unconventional and boundary-pushing literary voices.

In a broader sense, Laughlin's quote sheds light on the editorial decision-making process, highlighting the complex interplay between personal preference, artistic vision, and the desire to offer a rich and varied reading experience to the audience. It underscores the importance of editorial autonomy and the role of the editor as a curator with a distinct literary sensibility and a unique perspective.

Overall, Laughlin's quote encapsulates a philosophy of anthology curation that prioritizes individual taste, diversity, and a rejection of rigid thematic structures. It offers valuable insights into the creative and editorial processes involved in compiling anthologies, emphasizing the significance of authenticity, balance, and a commitment to presenting a wide range of literary voices and forms.

In conclusion, Laughlin's approach to anthology curation, as reflected in his quote, speaks to the nuanced and multifaceted nature of the editorial process. By privileging personal preference, diversity, and a deliberate alternation of literary forms, Laughlin's methodology offers a compelling perspective on the art of anthology compilation. His words serve as a reminder of the importance of editorial autonomy, authenticity, and a commitment to presenting a rich and varied collection of literary works.