Meaning: Irving Layton, a Canadian poet, made this bold statement about his own work in an interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in 1975. The quote reflects Layton's confidence and self-assurance in his abilities as a poet, positioning himself alongside literary giants such as Shakespeare, Wordsworth, and Keats. However, this statement has been met with a range of reactions, from admiration to skepticism, and it has sparked discussions about Layton's place in the literary canon and the nature of artistic self-promotion.

Layton's claim to be on par with Shakespeare, Wordsworth, and Keats is undoubtedly audacious. These three poets are considered some of the greatest in the English language, and their works have stood the test of time, continuing to be studied, admired, and celebrated centuries after their creation. Layton's assertion raises questions about the criteria for evaluating the enduring significance of literary works and the role of self-promotion in the arts.

Layton's confidence in the longevity of his poetry suggests a belief in the timelessness and universality of his themes and style. He may have felt that his work addressed fundamental human experiences and emotions in a way that would resonate across generations, much like the works of the poets he mentioned. This level of confidence is not uncommon among artists, as the act of creation often requires a strong belief in the value and impact of one's own work.

On the other hand, Layton's statement can be seen as a deliberate provocation or a marketing tactic. By aligning himself with established literary figures, Layton may have sought to generate attention and controversy around his work, sparking debates and increasing his visibility in the literary world. The quote can also be interpreted as a playful exaggeration or a form of self-expression, reflecting Layton's flamboyant and larger-than-life persona.

The quote has been the subject of much debate and analysis within literary circles. Some critics and scholars have dismissed Layton's claim as mere vanity or hyperbole, arguing that his work does not possess the enduring qualities of the poets he mentioned. Others have defended Layton, pointing to the innovative and impactful nature of his poetry and its contribution to the Canadian literary landscape.

It is important to consider the context in which Layton made this statement. He was known for his provocative and controversial public persona, and his statements were often intended to challenge conventional thinking and stir up conversation. Understanding Layton's personality and the cultural milieu in which he operated can provide insight into the motivations behind this bold assertion.

In conclusion, Irving Layton's claim to have written poems that will survive alongside the works of Shakespeare, Wordsworth, and Keats is a striking example of artistic self-assurance and the complexities of evaluating the enduring significance of literary works. Whether viewed as an expression of genuine belief, a marketing tactic, or a playful exaggeration, Layton's statement has sparked discussions about the nature of artistic legacy and the role of self-promotion in the arts. Regardless of one's interpretation, it is clear that Layton's boldness and confidence continue to provoke thought and reflection on the nature of literary greatness.