Meaning: Norman Lear, an American television producer and writer known for creating iconic sitcoms such as "All in the Family," "The Jeffersons," and "One Day at a Time," made this thought-provoking statement about the influential figures at the top of major corporations. The quote sheds light on the vast disconnect between those in power and the everyday lives of ordinary individuals. In essence, Lear is highlighting the stark contrast between the lives and perspectives of corporate leaders and the general public.

When Lear refers to "the head of General Electric, the head of News Corp, the head of Viacom," and "the head of this giant international corporation that wants these ratings," he is alluding to the top executives who hold immense power and influence within these major conglomerates. These individuals are often removed from the realities of the average person, existing in a world where their decisions and actions have far-reaching implications but may be detached from the daily experiences of the broader population.

The phrase "at great, great remove" encapsulates the idea that these corporate leaders are distanced from the everyday struggles, concerns, and aspirations of ordinary people. Their positions of authority and privilege can create a significant gap between their understanding of the world and the lived experiences of the general public. This disparity in perspective can have profound effects on the decisions made within these corporations, especially when it comes to shaping media content and business strategies.

In the context of media corporations, such as General Electric, News Corp, and Viacom, the pursuit of ratings and profits can sometimes overshadow the responsibility to provide meaningful, diverse, and representative content. Lear's statement implies that the individuals at the helm of these corporations may prioritize financial success and market dominance without fully appreciating the impact of their decisions on society at large.

Moreover, the reference to "this giant international corporation that wants these ratings" underscores the global reach and influence of such entities. The quest for high ratings and viewership often shapes the programming and news coverage disseminated to audiences worldwide. Lear's observation serves as a reminder that the motivations and intentions driving these corporate entities may not always align with the best interests of their audiences.

The quote also raises important questions about the nature of power, accountability, and empathy within corporate leadership. Are those at the top truly attuned to the needs and concerns of diverse communities, or are they operating from a position of detachment and privilege? How do their decisions impact the narratives, values, and perceptions that permeate the media landscape?

From a societal standpoint, Lear's words prompt reflection on the dynamics of influence and the potential consequences of corporate disconnect. The concentration of power in the hands of a few can shape public discourse, cultural representation, and the dissemination of information. As such, the quote serves as a call to critically examine the implications of corporate control over media and entertainment, especially in an era marked by digital interconnectedness and the rapid circulation of content.

In conclusion, Norman Lear's quote encapsulates a poignant commentary on the distance between corporate leaders and the broader public, particularly within the context of media conglomerates. It underscores the need for greater awareness, empathy, and ethical responsibility among those in positions of influence. By acknowledging this divide, there is an opportunity to foster more inclusive, authentic, and socially conscious media environments that resonate with diverse audiences and reflect the multifaceted realities of the world we inhabit.