Meaning: This quote by Bernard Levin, a renowned British journalist, delves into the complex nature of belief and the human tendency to hold onto certain convictions regardless of contradictory evidence. The quote suggests that even in the face of manifest absurdity, those who are determined to believe in something will continue to do so, undeterred by rational arguments or factual inconsistencies. This insight sheds light on the powerful influence of belief and the ways in which it can override rational thinking and critical analysis.

The notion of "manifest absurdity" refers to ideas or beliefs that are clearly irrational, illogical, or at odds with empirical evidence. Despite the manifest absurdity of such beliefs, Levin suggests that there are individuals who are unwavering in their commitment to them. This observation speaks to the resilience of belief and the capacity for individuals to maintain their convictions even when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Levin's quote touches upon the psychological phenomenon of cognitive dissonance, which occurs when individuals hold conflicting beliefs or attitudes simultaneously. In such instances, individuals may experience discomfort or tension, prompting them to either reject conflicting information or rationalize it in a way that aligns with their existing beliefs. This tendency to rationalize and defend one's beliefs, even in the face of manifest absurdity, speaks to the powerful role that belief plays in shaping individuals' perceptions and interpretations of the world around them.

The quote also highlights the role of motivation in belief formation and maintenance. It suggests that individuals who are motivated to believe in something will persist in their convictions, regardless of external evidence or logical reasoning. This speaks to the emotional and psychological investment that individuals have in their beliefs, which can be deeply intertwined with their sense of identity, values, and worldview.

In the context of journalism and public discourse, Levin's quote underscores the challenge of addressing and challenging deeply held beliefs, particularly when they are rooted in manifest absurdity. It speaks to the limitations of rational argumentation and factual evidence in swaying individuals who are firmly entrenched in their convictions. This presents a significant obstacle for journalists and communicators seeking to counter misinformation, falsehoods, and unfounded beliefs that may persist despite their manifest absurdity.

Moreover, the quote raises important questions about the nature of truth, belief, and the human mind. It invites reflection on the ways in which belief systems are formed, reinforced, and perpetuated, as well as the mechanisms that underlie individuals' resistance to contradictory information. This has implications for fields such as psychology, sociology, and communication, where understanding the dynamics of belief and persuasion is crucial for addressing misinformation and promoting critical thinking.

In conclusion, Bernard Levin's quote offers a thought-provoking exploration of the tenacity of belief in the face of manifest absurdity. It points to the complex interplay of motivation, cognitive dissonance, and emotional investment in shaping individuals' adherence to certain beliefs, even when they defy logic and evidence. By shedding light on the resilience of belief, the quote prompts us to consider the challenges of addressing and countering manifest absurdity in public discourse and the broader societal landscape.