Meaning: The quote "What has happened to architecture since the second world war that the only passers-by who can contemplate it without pain are those equipped with a white stick and a dog?" by Bernard Levin, a British journalist, raises a thought-provoking question about the state of architecture in the post-World War II era. This quote reflects a critical perspective on the impact of modern architecture on the general public and emphasizes the need to consider the accessibility and aesthetic appeal of architectural designs.

In the aftermath of World War II, there was a significant shift in architectural styles and philosophies. The modernist movement, characterized by functionality, minimalism, and a break from traditional ornamentation, gained prominence. Architects embraced new materials and construction techniques, leading to the emergence of sleek, geometric structures that aimed to symbolize progress and modernity. However, as the quote suggests, this shift in architectural trends also raised concerns about the alienating and intimidating nature of some modernist buildings.

Levin's comparison of architecture to something that only visually impaired individuals can contemplate without pain is a striking metaphor that highlights the disconnect between modern architectural aesthetics and the general public. The implication is that many post-war architectural designs are so jarring or disorienting that only those who cannot see them can do so without discomfort. This raises the question of whether architecture, in its pursuit of innovation and novelty, has overlooked the human experience and failed to create environments that are visually engaging and harmonious for all individuals.

The quote also alludes to the concept of universal design and the idea that architecture should be inclusive and accessible to people of all abilities. The mention of a white stick and a dog evokes the image of a visually impaired person navigating their surroundings, emphasizing the importance of creating architectural spaces that can be appreciated and navigated by everyone. It underscores the need for architects to consider not only the visual impact of their designs but also their practicality and usability for individuals with diverse needs.

Moreover, Levin's critique of post-war architecture prompts reflection on the role of architecture in shaping the urban landscape and influencing the daily experiences of city dwellers. Modernist buildings often dominated city skylines, and their imposing presence could evoke a sense of detachment or unease among the public. The quote serves as a reminder that architecture should contribute to the vitality and beauty of urban environments, fostering a sense of connection and delight for all who encounter it.

In conclusion, Bernard Levin's quote encapsulates a critical perspective on the evolution of architecture since the second world war. It challenges architects and urban planners to consider the impact of their designs on the public, emphasizing the importance of creating inclusive, visually appealing, and accessible architectural spaces. It sparks a dialogue about the balance between innovation and human-centered design, urging the architectural community to prioritize the creation of environments that enrich the lives of all individuals, regardless of their visual abilities.