Meaning:
The quote "Crabbed and obscure definitions are of no use beyond a narrow circle of students, of whom probably every one has a pet one of his own" by Frederick Pollock, Judge, touches on the accessibility and practicality of definitions. Frederick Pollock was a prominent English legal scholar and jurist, known for his contributions to legal philosophy and the development of the common law. In this quote, Pollock emphasizes the limitations of convoluted and overly complex definitions, suggesting that they are only beneficial to a small and specialized group of individuals.
Pollock's use of the term "crabbed and obscure" implies that definitions which are overly complicated and difficult to understand are of little practical value. This assertion can be applied not only to legal concepts but also to various fields of study and everyday communication. When definitions are convoluted, they hinder rather than facilitate understanding, making them impractical for broader audiences. Pollock's choice of words highlights the negative impact of convoluted definitions, suggesting that they are not only unhelpful but also potentially obstructive to learning and comprehension.
The phrase "beyond a narrow circle of students" underscores the limited utility of complex definitions. Pollock implies that such definitions can only be appreciated and understood by a select group of individuals who possess the specialized knowledge and expertise to decipher them. This notion aligns with the idea that overly technical or intricate definitions cater to a niche audience, excluding those who do not possess the requisite background or familiarity with the subject matter. As a result, the broader dissemination and practical application of these definitions are hindered, limiting their overall usefulness.
The latter part of the quote, "of whom probably every one has a pet one of his own," introduces the concept of personal interpretation and preference in understanding definitions. Pollock suggests that within the narrow circle of students who may benefit from convoluted definitions, each individual likely has their own favored interpretation or understanding of the concept. This emphasizes the subjective nature of comprehension and interpretation, highlighting the diversity of perspectives even within a specialized group. Additionally, it further reinforces the idea that convoluted definitions may not lead to universal understanding or consensus, as individuals may develop their own nuanced interpretations based on their unique experiences and perspectives.
Pollock's quote ultimately serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity and accessibility in defining concepts. It highlights the need for definitions to be comprehensible and practical for a wider audience, rather than being excessively esoteric and exclusive. By emphasizing the limitations of convoluted definitions and the subjective nature of interpretation, Pollock prompts a reevaluation of the efficacy and accessibility of the language used to convey complex ideas.
In conclusion, Frederick Pollock's quote underscores the inherent limitations of convoluted and obscure definitions, particularly in their applicability beyond a narrow circle of specialized individuals. By emphasizing the impracticality and subjective nature of such definitions, Pollock encourages the prioritization of clarity and accessibility in defining concepts across disciplines. This quote serves as a valuable reflection on the role of language and communication in facilitating understanding and promoting inclusivity within academic, professional, and everyday contexts.