Meaning:
The quote "The State thrives on war - unless, of course, it is defeated and crushed - expands on it, glories in it" by Murray Rothbard, an economist and political theorist, encapsulates a profound observation about the relationship between the state and warfare. Rothbard was known for his libertarian views and his critical analysis of the role of the state in society. In this quote, he suggests that the state benefits from war and often seeks to perpetuate and glorify it for its own gain.
Rothbard's assertion that the state thrives on war can be interpreted through historical and contemporary examples. Throughout history, many states have engaged in warfare to expand their territories, gain resources, or exert influence over other nations. The spoils of war, including land, wealth, and power, have often been used to strengthen the state's position and authority. Furthermore, the military-industrial complex, a term used to describe the close relationship between the military and defense industry, has been a significant source of economic growth for many states. This complex has often fueled the perpetuation of war and conflict, as it benefits financially from military expansion and arms sales.
In addition to the material benefits, the state may also use war as a means to rally public support, exert control over its citizens, and distract from domestic issues. By portraying war as a necessary and noble endeavor, the state can manipulate public opinion and garner solidarity for its actions. This can serve to strengthen the state's legitimacy and authority, as well as divert attention from internal challenges or dissent.
The idea that the state expands on and glorifies war is evident in the ways in which conflicts are often framed and portrayed in the media and political discourse. States have been known to use propaganda and rhetoric to romanticize war, portray enemies as threats to national security, and justify military interventions. This can create a culture that glorifies and celebrates warfare, perpetuating a cycle of conflict and aggression.
Rothbard's perspective on the state's relationship with war is also supported by the concept of "militarism," which refers to the glorification of the military and the prioritization of military values in society. Militarism can lead to an overemphasis on military solutions to political problems and an increase in defense spending, further entrenching the state's reliance on war as a means of asserting power and influence.
It is important to note that Rothbard's views are controversial and subject to debate. While some may argue that the state's reliance on war is a natural consequence of international relations and security concerns, others may contend that diplomacy and peaceful resolutions should be prioritized over military action. Nonetheless, Rothbard's quote provokes critical reflection on the complex and often contentious relationship between the state and warfare.