Meaning: This quote by Sallust, the Roman historian, reflects on the nature of emotional response to persuasive speech, particularly in the context of preaching. Sallust suggests that individuals who are easily moved to tears by the words of a preacher may not necessarily possess strong moral character or conviction. Instead, he implies that their emotional response may be fleeting, and they may revert to unethical behavior once their feelings dissipate.

Sallust was a prominent Roman historian and politician during the first century BC, known for his writings on the history of the Roman Republic. His works often delved into the moral and ethical conduct of individuals, as well as the political and social dynamics of his time. This quote, extracted from his writings, provides valuable insight into his observations and reflections on human behavior and emotional response to persuasive rhetoric.

The quote is a commentary on the transient nature of emotional reactions and the potential disparity between outward displays of emotion and one's true character. Sallust seems to caution against placing too much emphasis on the immediate emotional impact of persuasive speech, suggesting that it may not necessarily reflect the inner moral fiber or integrity of an individual. His use of the terms "weak" and "rascal" conveys a sense of moral judgment, implying that those who are easily swayed by emotional rhetoric may lack the strength of character or may possess deceitful tendencies.

In the context of preaching, the quote can be interpreted as a warning against being overly influenced by the emotional appeal of a speaker without considering the substance of their message or the authenticity of their character. It serves as a reminder to exercise discernment and critical thinking, rather than being solely swayed by the emotional power of persuasive language.

This quote also raises broader questions about the nature of emotional response and its relationship to morality. It prompts consideration of whether outward displays of emotion, such as tears, are indicative of genuine moral virtue or simply a superficial reaction to compelling oratory. Sallust seems to suggest that true moral character is revealed through consistent actions and integrity, rather than momentary emotional displays.

Furthermore, the quote invites reflection on the responsibility of the speaker in evoking emotional responses from their audience. It prompts consideration of the ethical implications of using emotional manipulation or sensationalism in persuasive communication, especially in the context of preaching or public speaking.

In conclusion, Sallust's quote offers a thought-provoking commentary on the nature of emotional response, moral character, and persuasive rhetoric. It encourages critical reflection on the relationship between emotion and morality, as well as the ethical responsibilities of both speakers and listeners in the context of persuasive communication.