Meaning: This quote by Josh Schwartz, a prominent television producer, offers insight into the portrayal of high school characters in television shows. Schwartz is known for creating successful teen dramas such as "The O.C." and "Gossip Girl," which often feature teenage characters navigating the complexities of high school life. The quote reflects the common practice in television of portraying characters as high school students for an extended period, regardless of how much time has passed within the narrative.

In essence, Schwartz is acknowledging the tendency in television to keep characters in the high school setting for as long as it serves the needs of the show. This practice allows for flexibility in storytelling, as it enables writers and producers to maintain the dynamics and storylines associated with the high school setting, even as the characters age in real time.

One of the key reasons for this approach is the appeal of high school-based narratives to the target audience of many teen-oriented shows. The high school experience is a time of significant growth, self-discovery, and social dynamics, making it an ideal backdrop for engaging storytelling. By keeping characters in high school for an extended period, writers can continue to explore these themes and issues, resonating with the experiences of the show's young viewers.

Furthermore, the decision to elongate the high school experience for characters also offers practical advantages for television productions. It allows for a more prolonged exploration of character development and relationships, as well as the opportunity to introduce and resolve various story arcs within the familiar high school setting. This approach can help maintain viewer engagement and provide a sense of continuity in the narrative.

However, there are potential drawbacks to this approach as well. One of the most significant concerns is the potential disconnection between the age of the characters and the actors portraying them. As the actors naturally age, the portrayal of characters as perpetual high school students can become increasingly unrealistic. This dissonance can sometimes diminish the authenticity of the storytelling and the audience's ability to relate to the characters' experiences.

Moreover, the decision to keep characters in high school for an extended period can limit the narrative possibilities for character growth and progression. It may prevent the exploration of new environments, experiences, and challenges that come with transitioning to young adulthood. This limitation can potentially constrain the depth and breadth of storytelling within the series.

In conclusion, Josh Schwartz's quote sheds light on the deliberate and strategic decision-making involved in portraying high school-aged characters in television shows. While it offers advantages in terms of audience appeal and narrative flexibility, it also raises questions about the realism and long-term storytelling potential of such an approach. Ultimately, the balance between maintaining the allure of the high school setting and allowing for character evolution is a delicate one that requires careful consideration in the development of successful television dramas.