Meaning: The quote by Stephen Breyer, a judge of the Supreme Court of the United States, addresses the fundamental principles of judicial decision-making and the importance of independence in the judiciary. Breyer's words emphasize the need for a selection system that ensures judges are able to decide cases based on the law and facts, without being influenced by public opinion or popular sentiment.

In this quote, Breyer underscores the significance of maintaining judicial independence in the face of various selection systems. He suggests that regardless of the method through which judges are appointed or elected, the ultimate goal should be to cultivate an environment where judges feel empowered to decide cases based on the law and legal principles, rather than succumbing to the pressures of popular opinion or fleeting public sentiments. This sentiment reflects the core principles of the rule of law and the separation of powers, which are essential components of a functioning democratic society.

The notion of judicial independence has long been a cornerstone of democratic governance and the rule of law. It ensures that judges are free from external influences or pressures that may compromise their ability to render impartial and fair decisions. This independence enables judges to interpret and apply the law without fear of reprisal or interference from political or societal forces. It also safeguards the integrity and credibility of the judicial system, fostering public trust and confidence in the administration of justice.

The concept of judicial independence is enshrined in the constitutions of many countries and is upheld through various mechanisms, including the appointment and tenure of judges, as well as ethical standards and codes of conduct. The selection process for judges, whether through appointments or elections, plays a crucial role in preserving judicial independence. Breyer's quote underscores the need for a selection system that prioritizes the preservation of judicial autonomy and shields judges from external pressures that may compromise their ability to uphold the rule of law.

Breyer's emphasis on the "bottom line" reflects the foundational principle that the judiciary must remain steadfast in its commitment to impartiality and adherence to the law. It highlights the inherent tension between the judiciary and popular opinion, emphasizing the need for judges to resist the allure of momentary public sentiment and instead focus on the enduring principles of justice and legality. This sentiment aligns with the traditional role of the judiciary as a check on the potential excesses of majoritarianism, ensuring that individual rights and constitutional principles are upheld even in the face of shifting public attitudes.

In conclusion, Stephen Breyer's quote encapsulates the enduring importance of judicial independence and the need for a selection system that prioritizes the preservation of this independence. His words serve as a reminder of the critical role that an impartial and independent judiciary plays in upholding the rule of law and preserving the fundamental principles of justice in a democratic society. By emphasizing the imperative for judges to decide cases without succumbing to popular will, Breyer underscores the enduring commitment to legal principles that transcends transient public opinion.