Meaning: The quote by Stephen Breyer, a former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, touches on the topic of judicial selection and the system of electing judges. Breyer's quote reflects his perspective on the judicial selection process, drawing on his personal background growing up in California and San Francisco.

In the United States, the methods for selecting judges vary by state and level of court. The selection process can involve appointment by the executive branch, election by the public, or a combination of both. Breyer's mention of growing up in California and San Francisco is significant because California is one of the states that employs an elective system for selecting judges.

In the context of Breyer's quote, the phrase "We are selected" likely refers to the fact that judges, including those at the federal level, are typically nominated and appointed by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate. This process applies to federal judges, including Supreme Court justices. However, Breyer's experience in California exposed him to a different approach to judicial selection, which is the elective system for judges.

In the elective system, judges are chosen through a process of popular vote. This means that members of the public have the opportunity to directly participate in the selection of judges by casting their votes in judicial elections. This method of judicial selection is commonly used in various states across the U.S., including California. The system of electing judges is often seen as a way to ensure judicial accountability to the electorate, as judges are directly answerable to the voters.

Breyer's reference to the system of electing judges in California and San Francisco indicates that he is familiar with the dynamics and implications of this method of judicial selection. The elective system can raise questions about the potential influence of political factors, campaign financing, and public opinion on the judiciary. It also highlights the importance of judicial independence and impartiality in the face of electoral politics.

Furthermore, Breyer's upbringing in California and exposure to the elective system of selecting judges may have influenced his views on the broader issue of judicial selection. As a Supreme Court justice, Breyer has been involved in interpreting and shaping the laws that govern the selection and functioning of the judiciary, making his perspective on this matter particularly insightful.

In conclusion, Stephen Breyer's quote sheds light on the complexities of judicial selection and the diverse methods employed across different states. His personal experience growing up in California and witnessing the system of electing judges has likely informed his understanding of the nuances and implications of various approaches to selecting members of the judiciary. The quote serves as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of judicial selection and the importance of considering different perspectives and experiences in shaping the legal system.