Meaning: The quote you've provided is from Samuel Alexander, a prominent philosopher who made significant contributions to the fields of metaphysics and epistemology. In this quote, Alexander discusses the distinction between two types of experience: the experienc-ing and the experienc-ed.

The concept of experienc-ing can be understood as the act of undergoing or participating in an experience. It refers to the active engagement of an individual with their surroundings, thoughts, emotions, and sensations. Experienc-ing encompasses the process of perception, cognition, and awareness. It involves the individual's direct interaction with the world, both external and internal, and the continuous flow of conscious and subconscious activities.

On the other hand, experienc-ed refers to the outcome or result of the experienc-ing process. It is the content or object of the experience, the perceived phenomena, or the mental representations that arise from the act of experiencing. Experienc-ed can be seen as the product of the experienc-ing process, including memories, emotions, ideas, and sensory impressions that are stored in the individual's consciousness.

The use of technical words to distinguish these two kinds of experience reflects Alexander's interest in precision and clarity in philosophical discourse. By introducing these specialized terms, he aims to create a conceptual framework that allows for a more nuanced understanding of the complexities involved in the process of experiencing and the nature of the experienced phenomena.

In essence, Alexander's distinction between experienc-ing and experienc-ed highlights the dynamic and multifaceted nature of human experience. It emphasizes the active involvement of the individual in shaping their experiences while also acknowledging the passive reception of external stimuli and the internalization of those stimuli into the realm of conscious awareness.

From a philosophical perspective, this distinction raises questions about the nature of reality, the relationship between the subject and the object, and the role of consciousness in shaping our understanding of the world. It invites further exploration into the nature of perception, cognition, and the ways in which we construct meaning from our experiences.

In contemporary philosophical discussions, Alexander's distinction between experienc-ing and experienc-ed continues to be relevant, especially in the fields of phenomenology, consciousness studies, and the philosophy of mind. Scholars and researchers draw upon this distinction to investigate the processes of lived experience, the nature of qualia, and the ways in which subjective and objective aspects of experience intertwine.

Moreover, the distinction between experienc-ing and experienc-ed has implications for various areas beyond philosophy, including psychology, cognitive science, and the arts. It informs discussions about the nature of embodied cognition, the role of perception in artistic expression, and the subjective nature of emotional and aesthetic experiences.

In conclusion, Samuel Alexander's quote about the distinction between experienc-ing and experienc-ed offers a thought-provoking insight into the complexities of human experience. By introducing technical terminology to delineate these two aspects of experience, Alexander contributes to a deeper understanding of the active and passive dimensions of our engagement with the world and the multifaceted nature of the phenomena we encounter. This distinction continues to inspire philosophical inquiry and interdisciplinary exploration, shedding light on the intricate interplay between consciousness, perception, and the construction of meaning in our lives.