Meaning: This quote by Samuel Alexander, a renowned philosopher, delves into the distinction between cognition and conation and the value of defining these terms properly. To fully understand the quote, it is essential to unpack the concepts of cognition and conation, as well as their relationship to mental action.

Cognition refers to the mental processes involved in acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses. It encompasses perception, reasoning, memory, and other processes that contribute to the formation of beliefs and understanding of the world. On the other hand, conation pertains to the mental processes involved in striving, desiring, and willing. It encompasses motivation, intention, and the impulse to act or achieve goals.

In the quote, Samuel Alexander suggests that cognition is not an element of mental action, nor is it an aspect of it in any real sense. This statement challenges the traditional view that cognition is an integral part of mental action, highlighting a distinction between cognitive processes and the broader scope of mental action. Alexander argues that although cognition is not a fundamental element of mental action, the distinction between cognition and conation holds a definite value if properly defined.

The distinction between cognition and conation has been a subject of philosophical inquiry, particularly in the fields of psychology and metaphysics. The delineation of these concepts allows for a nuanced understanding of the different aspects of mental activity and the complexities of human consciousness. By recognizing the unique characteristics of cognition and conation, scholars aim to elucidate the nature of human thought, motivation, and behavior.

When Alexander mentions the "definite value" of properly defining the distinction between cognition and conation, he alludes to the practical and theoretical implications of this conceptual clarity. By accurately delineating these mental processes, researchers and practitioners can better understand and address various aspects of human experience, including learning, decision-making, and goal pursuit. Moreover, a precise understanding of cognition and conation can inform therapeutic interventions, educational strategies, and the study of consciousness.

It is important to note that Samuel Alexander's perspective on the distinction between cognition and conation aligns with the broader philosophical discourse on the nature of mind and consciousness. Philosophers and psychologists have grappled with questions about the relationship between cognitive processes, volition, and the subjective experience of being conscious. The exploration of cognition and conation contributes to these inquiries, shedding light on the intricate workings of the human mind.

In conclusion, Samuel Alexander's quote underscores the significance of properly defining the distinction between cognition and conation in understanding mental action. By elucidating the unique characteristics of these mental processes, scholars and practitioners can gain deeper insights into human cognition, motivation, and behavior. The delineation of cognition and conation holds practical and theoretical value, offering a framework for comprehending the complexities of the human mind and consciousness.