Meaning: The quote by Morris Cohen, a prominent American philosopher, delves into the concept of being open-minded and willing to consider alternative perspectives before making a determination. Cohen's words highlight the discomfort that both conservatives and revolutionaries may feel when faced with the need to critically evaluate different possibilities. The quote addresses the inherent challenge of being open to new ideas and possibilities, even when they may challenge established beliefs or ideologies. Cohen's exploration of this theme provides a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of intellectual inquiry and the difficulties that can arise when confronting unconventional or conflicting viewpoints.

Cohen's assertion that an "open eye for possible alternatives" can be disconcerting to conservatives and revolutionaries reflects a fundamental tension that exists within philosophical, political, and social discourse. On the one hand, conservatives typically seek to preserve traditional values and institutions, often resisting change and advocating for stability and continuity. On the other hand, revolutionaries are inclined to challenge the status quo, advocating for radical change and the rejection of established norms. In this context, Cohen's observation suggests that both groups may find it unsettling to entertain alternative perspectives that challenge their respective worldviews.

For conservatives, the discomfort with considering alternative possibilities may stem from a desire to maintain the existing order and resist disruptive or destabilizing forces. The prospect of entertaining new ideas that diverge from established traditions can be perceived as a threat to the stability and coherence of the conservative worldview. Similarly, revolutionaries, who are often driven by a desire to dismantle entrenched power structures and effect transformative change, may find it disconcerting to engage with alternative viewpoints that could potentially undermine the revolutionary agenda or dilute the momentum for radical transformation.

Cohen's emphasis on the need to "scrutinize" possible alternatives before determining the best course of action underscores the importance of critical thinking and intellectual rigor in navigating complex issues. By acknowledging the necessity of careful examination and evaluation, Cohen encourages a disciplined approach to decision-making that transcends ideological predispositions and preconceived notions. This call for rigorous scrutiny aligns with the principles of rational inquiry and acknowledges the inherent complexity of navigating competing ideas and perspectives.

Furthermore, the quote alludes to the idea that being open to diverse viewpoints and considering alternative possibilities is an essential component of intellectual growth and progress. By acknowledging that the process of determining the best course of action requires a willingness to confront disconcerting alternatives, Cohen challenges individuals to embrace intellectual discomfort and engage in robust critical analysis. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of complex issues and promotes a more nuanced and informed decision-making process.

In conclusion, Morris Cohen's quote captures the tension between openness to alternative perspectives and the discomfort it can evoke in both conservative and revolutionary circles. The quote serves as a reminder of the challenges inherent in confronting divergent viewpoints and the necessity of critically evaluating alternative possibilities. By embracing the disconcerting nature of considering alternatives, individuals can cultivate a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues and promote intellectual growth and progress. Cohen's words resonate as a call to embrace intellectual discomfort and approach decision-making with a commitment to rigorous scrutiny and open-minded inquiry.