Meaning: The quote by Morris Cohen, a prominent American philosopher, delves into the idea that literature and philosophy have the unique ability to bring back old ideas and figures from the past, a phenomenon that might be unsettling for a rational scientist. This thought-provoking quote speaks to the contrasting approaches of these disciplines and their respective attitudes toward history, tradition, and the revival of past concepts and personalities.

Literature and philosophy are both fields that often engage with the ideas and figures of the past, but they do so in different ways and for different purposes. In literature, the resurrection of past idols can take the form of reimagining historical figures in fictional works, using them as characters to explore timeless themes and ideas. Authors often draw inspiration from historical events and individuals, bringing them back to life in their narratives to shed light on the human condition and the enduring relevance of the past.

Philosophy, on the other hand, engages with the past through the critical examination and reinterpretation of historical ideas and concepts. Philosophers frequently revisit the writings and teachings of ancient, medieval, and modern thinkers, reviving their intellectual contributions and subjecting them to rigorous analysis and debate. This process of resurrecting past idols in philosophy allows for the reevaluation and recontextualization of historical thought within contemporary philosophical discourse.

Cohen's reference to the "sober scientist" highlights the contrast between the approaches of literature and philosophy with that of the scientific discipline. While literature and philosophy embrace the revival of past idols as a means of exploring the complexities of human existence and intellectual heritage, the scientific method tends to prioritize empirical evidence, verifiable data, and forward-looking inquiry. The idea of resurrecting past idols may indeed be disconcerting to a scientist committed to a strictly empirical and evidence-based approach to knowledge.

Cohen's observation also touches on the broader tension between tradition and innovation, history and progress. In literature and philosophy, the act of resurrecting past idols is often a deliberate and conscious engagement with tradition, seeking to glean insights and inspiration from the wisdom of previous generations. This process can be enriching and illuminating, offering a deeper understanding of the human experience and the continuity of ideas across time.

Moreover, the frequency with which literature and philosophy resurrect past idols speaks to the enduring resonance of historical figures and ideas. It reflects the belief that the wisdom and insights of the past have the power to inform and influence contemporary thought, challenging the notion of linear progress and emphasizing the cyclical nature of human intellectual endeavor.

In conclusion, Morris Cohen's quote encapsulates the dynamic relationship between literature, philosophy, and the past. It highlights the distinctive ways in which these disciplines engage with history, tradition, and the revival of past idols, offering valuable insights into the enduring relevance of historical ideas and figures in the ongoing pursuit of knowledge and understanding.