Meaning: The quote "All good criticism should be judged the way art is. You shouldn't read it the way you read history or science" by Leslie Fiedler, a prominent literary critic and scholar, offers a compelling perspective on the nature and purpose of criticism. Fiedler's words invite us to consider criticism as a form of artistic expression rather than a purely analytical or empirical endeavor.

In this quote, Fiedler suggests that the evaluation of criticism should mirror the way we engage with art. When we approach a work of art, whether it be a painting, a piece of music, or a literary composition, we do so with a certain degree of subjectivity and openness to interpretation. We recognize that art is not meant to be consumed passively or objectively but rather invites us to respond emotionally, intellectually, and even spiritually. Similarly, Fiedler argues that good criticism should be approached with a similar mindset, one that acknowledges the subjective nature of interpretation and the inherent creativity involved in crafting a critical perspective.

By likening criticism to art, Fiedler urges us to appreciate the artistry and individuality of the critic's voice. Just as artists infuse their work with their unique vision and sensibility, critics bring their own perspectives, biases, and experiences to their analyses. Rather than seeking an objective "truth" in criticism, Fiedler encourages readers to engage with it as a form of expression that reflects the complexity and diversity of human thought and emotion.

Moreover, Fiedler's comparison of criticism to art challenges the notion that criticism should be approached with the same rigor and detachment as history or science. While historical and scientific inquiry often prioritizes empirical evidence and logical reasoning, Fiedler suggests that criticism operates on a different plane, one that is more attuned to the nuances of human experience and the multifaceted nature of artistic expression.

Furthermore, Fiedler's quote implies that good criticism, like art, has the capacity to evoke a range of responses and emotions. Just as a powerful work of art can elicit joy, sadness, awe, or introspection, so too can insightful criticism provoke intellectual stimulation, contemplation, and debate. Fiedler's assertion challenges readers to approach criticism with a sense of openness and receptivity, recognizing that its value lies not only in its capacity to inform or persuade but also in its potential to resonate on a deeply personal level.

In essence, Fiedler's quote invites us to reconsider our preconceptions about criticism and to embrace a more nuanced and imaginative approach to engaging with critical discourse. By framing criticism as a form of art, Fiedler encourages us to recognize and celebrate the creative and subjective dimensions of critical thought, fostering a richer and more empathetic understanding of the diverse voices that contribute to our intellectual and cultural landscape.

In conclusion, Leslie Fiedler's quote challenges us to view criticism through the lens of art, acknowledging its subjectivity, creativity, and potential for emotional and intellectual impact. By encouraging us to approach criticism with the same openness and interpretive freedom that we bring to works of art, Fiedler calls attention to the rich and multifaceted nature of critical discourse, inviting readers to engage with it as a form of expression that reflects the complexity and diversity of human experience.