But, ancient Greece and ancient Rome - people did not happen to believe that creativity came from human beings back then, OK? People believed that creativity was this divine attendant spirit that came to human beings from some distant and unknowable source, for distant and unknowable reasons.

Profession: Novelist

Topics: People, Creativity, Greece, Rome, Spirit,

Wallpaper of quote
Views: 12
Meaning: Elizabeth Gilbert's quote reflects on the historical perspective of creativity in ancient Greece and ancient Rome. In this quote, she contrasts the belief in creativity as a divine force with the modern perception of creativity as a product of human agency. The quote suggests that in ancient times, creativity was not attributed solely to human beings but was seen as an external, mystical force that visited individuals for reasons beyond their understanding.

In ancient Greece, creativity and artistic inspiration were closely tied to the concept of divine inspiration. The Greeks believed in the nine Muses, goddesses who presided over the arts and sciences and were the source of inspiration for creative endeavors. The idea was that artists and thinkers were conduits for the divine, channeling inspiration from the Muses to create their works. This belief in external sources of creativity elevated the status of artists and thinkers, positioning them as vessels for divine expression rather than as independent creators.

Similarly, ancient Rome also held a belief in the influence of divine forces on creativity. The Romans adopted many of the Greek gods and beliefs, including the concept of the Muses as sources of inspiration. The Roman poet Ovid, for example, frequently invoked the Muses in his work, attributing his poetic abilities to their divine influence. This acknowledgment of external sources of creativity reinforced the idea that artistic and intellectual achievements were not solely the result of human effort, but were imbued with a transcendent quality.

The contrast that Elizabeth Gilbert draws between ancient beliefs in creativity and modern perspectives highlights a shift in the way creativity is understood. In contemporary society, creativity is often seen as an inherent human trait, accessible to all individuals and cultivated through education and practice. The emphasis on human agency and innovation has led to a democratization of creativity, with the recognition that anyone can be creative in their own way.

However, Gilbert's quote also raises questions about the nature of creativity and the mysterious origins of inspiration. While modern society may attribute creativity to human ingenuity, there remains a sense of awe and wonder surrounding the creative process. Artists, writers, and innovators often describe moments of inspiration as if something external has touched them, providing a glimpse into the enduring enigma of creativity.

In conclusion, Elizabeth Gilbert's quote offers a thought-provoking reflection on the historical and contemporary understanding of creativity. By contrasting ancient beliefs in divine inspiration with modern perspectives on human creativity, the quote invites contemplation on the nature of inspiration and the mysterious origins of creative expression. It serves as a reminder that while our understanding of creativity may have evolved, the profound and transcendent aspects of the creative process continue to captivate and intrigue us.

0.0 / 5

0 Reviews

5
(0)

4
(0)

3
(0)

2
(0)

1
(0)