Meaning: The quote by Laura Ingraham, a conservative American television and radio talk show host, touches upon the perception of President Obama's popularity in Europe and the contrast it draws with the attitudes of other global powers. Ingraham's remark reflects a viewpoint that suggests a disconnect between the adoration for President Obama in certain parts of the world and the potential lack of impact it has on global politics and international relations. The quote is also critical of the media's focus on superficial aspects of the Obama presidency, such as his personal story and his wife, as opposed to more substantive geopolitical issues.

In the first part of the quote, Ingraham acknowledges the widespread popularity of President Obama in Europe, where he was often greeted by adoring crowds during his visits. This sentiment is supported by historical evidence, as Obama's presidency was marked by a high level of popularity in Europe, where his policies and charisma resonated with many people. The quote also alludes to the favorable media coverage that Obama received, both in the United States and abroad, highlighting the positive portrayal of his leadership and personal attributes.

However, Ingraham's rhetoric takes a critical turn as she questions the implications of this adoration. She poses the question of "how will this date end?" suggesting that the initial infatuation with Obama's persona may not lead to substantial or lasting changes in international relations. This skepticism is further emphasized when she asks, "to what end?" indicating a concern about the substantive impact of the love and admiration for President Obama.

The quote then pivots to highlight the superficial nature of the affection for Obama, particularly in contrast to the indifference of countries like North Korea, China, and Russia. Ingraham suggests that these nations are not swayed by the same factors that seem to endear Obama to European audiences. She brings attention to the media's focus on trivial aspects of the Obama presidency, such as Michelle Obama's physical appearance and gestures of diplomacy, like giving an iPod to the Queen of England. This critique implies that the media's emphasis on these superficial elements detracts from more important geopolitical considerations and foreign policy decisions.

Ingraham's quote encapsulates a perspective that challenges the notion of Obama's international popularity as a significant indicator of his effectiveness as a global leader. It questions the depth of the admiration for Obama in Europe and suggests that it may not translate into meaningful influence on key international issues, particularly in relation to countries with divergent interests and perspectives.

In conclusion, Laura Ingraham's quote offers a critical assessment of the international perception of President Obama's popularity, highlighting the disparity between his adoration in Europe and the indifference of other global powers. It raises important questions about the substantive impact of this popularity and the role of the media in shaping public perceptions of political leaders. The quote provokes reflection on the complexities of international relations and the multifaceted nature of global leadership.