Meaning: The quote by C. James, a journalist, suggests that the timing of mass industrial organization in the United States has had a complex impact on the political development of the American working class. To fully understand the significance of this quote, it is important to delve into the historical context and analyze the various ways in which industrialization has influenced the political landscape and the working class in the United States.

The late development of mass industrial organization in the United States refers to the period in the late 19th and early 20th centuries when the country experienced a significant shift from agrarian and craft-based production to large-scale industrial manufacturing. This transformation brought about profound changes in the economy, society, and politics of the United States. As industrialization progressed, it led to the rise of large corporations, the concentration of wealth, and the emergence of a distinct working class that was employed in factories, mines, and other industrial settings.

One of the ways in which industrialization stimulated the political development of the American working class was through the formation of labor unions and the rise of labor activism. As workers faced harsh working conditions, long hours, low wages, and limited rights, they began to organize and advocate for better treatment and improved working conditions. This gave rise to the labor movement, which played a crucial role in shaping the political consciousness of the working class and pushing for labor rights and protections.

Additionally, the growth of industrialization created opportunities for workers to mobilize politically and advocate for their interests. This led to the emergence of influential labor leaders and organizations that sought to influence government policies and legislation in favor of workers' rights. The political clout of the working class was also evident in the formation of political parties and movements that championed the interests of labor, such as the Populist Party and later the Socialist Party.

However, the quote also suggests that the late development of mass industrial organization may have retarded the political development of the American working class in certain ways. One possible interpretation is that the rapid and concentrated nature of industrialization may have overwhelmed and fragmented the working class, making it difficult for cohesive political movements to emerge. The sheer scale of industrialization and the vast number of workers employed in various industries may have hindered unified political action and coordination among the working class.

Furthermore, the influence of powerful industrialists and corporations during this period cannot be overlooked. The immense wealth and influence of industrial magnates, such as Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, posed significant challenges to the political empowerment of the working class. These industrialists often used their wealth to influence government policies and suppress labor activism, thereby impeding the political progress of the working class.

In conclusion, the quote by C. James sheds light on the intricate relationship between industrialization and the political development of the American working class. While industrialization stimulated the formation of labor movements and political activism, it also presented challenges and obstacles to the cohesive political development of the working class. Understanding this historical context is crucial for comprehending the complexities of labor politics and the enduring impact of industrialization on American society.