Meaning: The quote, "Why are we, as a nation so obsessed with foreign things? Is it a legacy of our colonial years? We want foreign television sets. We want foreign shirts. We want foreign technology. Why this obsession with everything imported?" by Abdul Kalam, reflects on the pervasive obsession with imported goods and technology in many developing countries, including India. Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, also known as the Missile Man of India, served as the 11th President of India and was a prominent scientist and engineer. Throughout his life, he advocated for self-reliance and the development of indigenous technology and innovation in India.

In the context of the quote, Kalam is raising important questions about the societal mindset and values that prioritize foreign goods over domestic products. The mention of colonial legacy points to the historical impact of colonialism on the mindset of the people in many post-colonial nations. During the colonial era, the colonizing powers often imposed their own goods and products, creating a sense of superiority around foreign goods and a devaluation of indigenous products. This mindset has persisted in many societies even after gaining independence, leading to a continued preference for foreign goods.

The quote also highlights the inclination towards foreign technology, which is a particularly relevant issue in the modern era. The rapid advancement of technology and the global dominance of certain tech companies have contributed to the perception that foreign technology is inherently superior. This has led to a dependency on foreign technology in many developing nations, often at the expense of nurturing and developing indigenous technological capabilities.

Kalam's observation about the obsession with foreign goods and technology raises concerns about the impact of this mindset on the economic, social, and cultural fabric of a nation. Economically, the preference for imported goods can lead to a trade imbalance and a drain on foreign exchange reserves. It can also hinder the growth of domestic industries and impede job creation within the country. Socially and culturally, the dominance of foreign goods can erode traditional practices and craftsmanship, leading to a loss of cultural identity and heritage.

Furthermore, the obsession with imported goods and technology can have implications for national security and sovereignty. Overreliance on foreign technology, especially in critical sectors such as defense and infrastructure, can pose risks in terms of data security, strategic vulnerabilities, and control over essential systems and processes.

In response to these challenges, Kalam's message encourages a shift in mindset towards self-reliance and indigenous innovation. He advocates for promoting and nurturing domestic industries, technology, and craftsmanship. By doing so, nations can build a foundation for sustainable economic growth, technological advancement, and cultural preservation.

In the case of India, Kalam's vision aligns with initiatives such as "Make in India" and "Digital India" that aim to boost domestic manufacturing and technological capabilities. These initiatives seek to reduce dependency on imported goods and technology while promoting indigenous innovation and entrepreneurship.

In conclusion, Abdul Kalam's quote serves as a thought-provoking commentary on the societal mindset and values surrounding imported goods and technology. It urges nations to reevaluate their priorities and invest in building self-reliant and innovative societies. By recognizing the significance of indigenous products and technology, countries can pave the way for sustainable development, economic independence, and cultural preservation.