Meaning: This quote by Thomas Keneally, an Australian novelist, highlights the historical context of sectarianism in Australia. The quote suggests that Australia, through the arrival of various immigrant groups, imported and unleashed the dogs of sectarianism into its society. It draws parallels between the sectarian tensions in Australia and those that existed in other places such as Glasgow, Liverpool, and Ireland.

The reference to the ships in the quote likely alludes to the waves of immigration that occurred in Australia's history, particularly during the 19th and early 20th centuries. These immigrants came from diverse backgrounds, including Irish, Scottish, English, and other European origins. With them, they brought their cultural, religious, and political differences, which sometimes led to conflicts and divisions within the Australian society.

Sectarianism, in this context, refers to the division and hostility between different religious or political groups. In the case of Australia, it often manifested in the form of conflicts between Catholics and Protestants, particularly due to the historical tensions between the Irish Catholic immigrants and the predominantly Protestant British establishment.

The mention of Glasgow, Liverpool, and Ireland in the quote is significant as it reflects the historical roots of sectarianism in these places. Glasgow and Liverpool, both major port cities in the United Kingdom, had experienced their own sectarian tensions, often linked to the influx of Irish immigrants and the religious divides within their communities. Similarly, Ireland, both in the north and south, has a long history of sectarian conflict, particularly between Catholics and Protestants.

Keneally's quote implies that the arrival of immigrants from these regions brought with them the existing sectarian tensions, which then became intertwined with the social fabric of Australia. This historical perspective sheds light on the complex dynamics of Australian society and the challenges it faced in integrating diverse immigrant communities.

The quote also suggests that the unleashing of sectarianism in Australian society was not a passive occurrence but rather a result of specific historical and social factors. It points to the idea that the tensions and divisions were not inherently Australian but were introduced and exacerbated by the interactions and conflicts among different immigrant groups.

In contemporary Australia, the legacy of sectarianism has greatly diminished, and the society has evolved to become more inclusive and multicultural. However, the historical impact of sectarianism is still evident in certain cultural, political, and social dynamics.

In conclusion, Thomas Keneally's quote provides a thought-provoking insight into the historical roots of sectarianism in Australia. It highlights the influence of immigration and the importation of existing tensions from other regions, shedding light on the complexities of Australian society and its historical challenges in integrating diverse communities. The quote encourages a deeper understanding of the historical context of sectarianism and its lasting impact on Australian society.