Meaning: Fredrik Bajer, a Danish writer, was a prominent figure in the peace movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The quote you provided reflects his views on the effectiveness of letter movements in advocating for change.

In the quote, Bajer emphasizes the importance of setting up a letter movement only in states where a significant response can be achieved. This suggests that he believed in the strategic use of letter campaigns to bring about meaningful change. He also notes that a letter movement presupposes a strong organization, indicating that the success of such a movement relies on a well-structured and coordinated effort.

Bajer's advocacy for the use of letter movements aligns with his broader commitment to peace and social justice. As a co-founder of the Inter-Parliamentary Union and a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Bajer was deeply engaged in efforts to promote international cooperation and conflict resolution. His belief in the power of organized letter campaigns likely stemmed from his understanding of the need to mobilize public opinion and political support for peaceful causes.

The concept of a letter movement can be understood as a form of grassroots activism, where individuals are encouraged to express their concerns and advocate for specific changes by writing letters to relevant authorities. By coordinating these efforts and channeling them towards states where a significant response is achievable, Bajer suggests that letter movements can exert meaningful pressure and influence.

Moreover, Bajer's emphasis on the need for a strong organization within a letter movement underscores the importance of structure, coordination, and leadership. This aligns with the broader principles of effective advocacy and activism, where strategic planning and organization are crucial for achieving impact.

In contemporary contexts, Bajer's insights on letter movements remain relevant. With the rise of digital communication and social media, the potential for organized letter campaigns to influence public discourse and policy decisions is perhaps even greater today. The ability to mobilize a large number of individuals to voice their concerns through letters, emails, or social media posts can amplify the impact of advocacy efforts.

Additionally, the emphasis on targeting states where a significant response can be achieved reflects a strategic approach to advocacy. It recognizes the importance of understanding the political and social dynamics of different regions and directing resources towards areas where change is most viable.

In conclusion, Fredrik Bajer's quote highlights the strategic and organized nature of effective advocacy through letter movements. By focusing on states where a significant response can be achieved and emphasizing the need for strong organization, Bajer underscores the potential for letter campaigns to drive meaningful change. His insights continue to offer valuable guidance for contemporary advocates seeking to leverage the power of grassroots activism and organized communication to advance their causes.