Meaning: The quote you provided is from Fredrik Bajer, a Danish writer and politician who was an active advocate for peace and disarmament. In this quote, Bajer is discussing the significance of a certain type of propaganda and its role in convincing people of the necessity for carrying on propaganda. Bajer's perspective on propaganda reflects his understanding of its power to shape public opinion and influence individuals' beliefs and actions.

Propaganda is a form of communication aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position. It often involves the dissemination of information, ideas, or rumors to further a specific agenda. While the word "propaganda" often carries negative connotations, as it is frequently associated with manipulation and deceit, Bajer's quote suggests that he perceives a positive aspect to this type of communication.

Bajer's reference to the "special value" of this propaganda indicates that he recognizes its ability to mobilize support and create a sense of urgency among those who are targeted by it. This aligns with the idea that propaganda can be a powerful tool for shaping public opinion and galvanizing individuals to action. Additionally, Bajer's mention of a "corps of propagandists" being trained through this process implies that he sees the potential for a dedicated group of individuals to be equipped with the skills and knowledge to effectively propagate a particular message or cause.

The context in which Bajer made this statement is crucial to understanding its full implications. As an advocate for peace and disarmament, Bajer likely viewed propaganda as a means to rally support for these causes. In his time, the use of propaganda to promote peace and disarmament would have been particularly relevant, given the prevalence of militaristic ideologies and the arms race that characterized the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Bajer's quote reflects an understanding of how propaganda can be harnessed to garner public backing for peace initiatives and to counteract the pervasive influence of militaristic propaganda.

It is worth noting that Bajer's views on propaganda may also be informed by his experiences as a politician and activist. In the realm of politics, the use of propaganda as a tool for persuasion and mobilization is well-documented. Politicians and advocacy groups often employ various forms of propaganda to sway public opinion and garner support for their policies and agendas. Bajer's understanding of the training of a "corps of propagandists" suggests a strategic approach to the dissemination of information and the cultivation of advocates who can effectively propagate a particular message.

In conclusion, Fredrik Bajer's quote sheds light on his perspective regarding the role and value of a specific type of propaganda. While the term "propaganda" is often associated with manipulation and deceit, Bajer's viewpoint emphasizes its potential to mobilize support and train advocates for a particular cause. His advocacy for peace and disarmament likely shaped his understanding of the positive impact that propaganda could have in furthering these goals. Overall, Bajer's quote invites reflection on the complex and multifaceted nature of propaganda and its implications for shaping public opinion and fostering social change.