Meaning: This quote, attributed to Wilfrid Laurier, the seventh Prime Minister of Canada, captures a perceived cultural difference between the French and the English in their approach to politics. Laurier, a prominent figure in Canadian politics, was known for his eloquence and ability to bridge the divide between English and French Canada. The quote reflects the historical and cultural context of the relationship between France and England, as well as the perspectives on politics held by their respective citizens.

Laurier's assertion that political sentiment is a passion for the sons of France suggests that the French people are deeply invested in and emotionally connected to political matters. This sentiment can be traced back to the tumultuous history of France, marked by revolutions, uprisings, and the formation of political ideologies that have shaped the nation's identity. French political history is characterized by passionate debates, intellectual discourse, and a strong sense of civic engagement, which has contributed to the perception of political sentiment as a passionate affair.

On the other hand, Laurier contrasts this with the Englishmen, whom he suggests view politics primarily as a question of business. This characterization may stem from the English tradition of pragmatism and a focus on practical concerns in political matters. England's history of parliamentary governance, constitutional monarchy, and the development of capitalism may have contributed to a perception of politics as a realm where pragmatic decisions are made to serve economic and strategic interests.

The quote reflects the generalizations and stereotypes that have existed between the French and the English regarding their approach to politics. While it is important to note that such generalizations may not hold true for every individual, they do offer insight into the broader cultural perceptions and historical contexts that have shaped these attitudes.

In addition to the cultural and historical context, the quote also highlights the different ways in which political engagement is perceived and experienced by people from different backgrounds. It suggests that the emotional and passionate involvement in political affairs may be more pronounced in French culture, while the English approach may be characterized by a more practical and business-like attitude.

Furthermore, the quote can be interpreted in the context of Canada's own history and the challenges of reconciling the French and English cultural and political traditions within the nation. As a bilingual and multicultural country, Canada has grappled with the complexities of balancing the interests and perspectives of its French and English-speaking populations. Laurier's ability to navigate and bridge these differences is reflected in the quote, as he acknowledges the cultural nuances while also seeking common ground and understanding.

In conclusion, Wilfrid Laurier's quote encapsulates the perceived differences in political sentiment between the French and English, offering insights into the cultural, historical, and emotional dimensions of political engagement. It serves as a reminder of the diverse ways in which people approach and experience politics, as well as the challenges and opportunities that arise from navigating these differences in a multicultural society.