Meaning: The quote by Aleksandr Lebed, a Russian politician and military officer, reflects on the gradual and complex process of building democracies in various countries. Lebed's statement suggests that the development of a true democracy takes a considerable amount of time and effort, and it cannot be achieved overnight or through sudden changes in government or leadership. The quote also implies a certain level of skepticism about the rapid transition from totalitarian rule to democracy.

Lebed's assertion that it took most so-called democratic states about 200 years on average to build their democracies is an interesting perspective on the historical evolution of democratic systems. While the specific timeframe of 200 years may vary from country to country, it underscores the idea that the establishment and consolidation of democratic principles and institutions is a long-term process that unfolds over generations. This notion aligns with the historical experiences of many established democracies, which have undergone gradual transformations, reforms, and struggles for political rights and freedoms over extended periods of time.

The reference to going to sleep under totalitarian rule and waking up in a democracy making Lebed laugh encapsulates the irony and complexity of political change. It highlights the contrast between the arduous, protracted efforts to advance democratic values and the abrupt or unexpected nature of political shifts. Lebed's amusement suggests a certain degree of skepticism or perhaps even cynicism about the suddenness of transitions from authoritarianism to democracy, implying that such transformations are not as straightforward or instantaneous as they may appear.

The quote invites reflection on the challenges and intricacies of democratic development, as well as the potential pitfalls of assuming that a change in regime automatically guarantees the establishment of a genuine democracy. It prompts consideration of the historical, social, and cultural factors that shape the trajectory of democracy in different contexts and the need for sustained commitment to democratic principles beyond mere changes in political leadership.

In considering Lebed's quote, it is essential to acknowledge the diverse paths that countries have taken in their quests for democracy. While some nations have undergone relatively swift and relatively peaceful transitions to democracy, others have faced prolonged struggles, upheavals, and setbacks in their efforts to establish and maintain democratic governance. The quote serves as a reminder that the attainment of democracy is not a one-size-fits-all process and that each country's journey toward democracy is unique and contingent on its historical, cultural, and political circumstances.

Furthermore, the quote raises questions about the nature of democracy itself and what it truly entails. It prompts consideration of the substantive aspects of democracy beyond mere procedural mechanisms, such as the rule of law, protection of human rights, pluralism, and a vibrant civil society. Lebed's observations encourage a deeper exploration of the fundamental principles and values that underpin genuine democracies and the challenges of nurturing and preserving these essential elements over time.

In conclusion, Aleksandr Lebed's quote offers thought-provoking insights into the complexities and nuances of democratic development. It underscores the time and dedication required to build and sustain democracies, as well as the potential pitfalls of assuming that political transitions automatically lead to genuine democratic governance. By prompting reflection on the historical experiences and diverse trajectories of democratic development, the quote encourages a deeper understanding of the multifaceted nature of democracy and the ongoing efforts needed to safeguard its principles and institutions.