Meaning: Elihu Root, a prominent American lawyer and statesman, made this observation about the popular tendency to blindly support extreme statements and claims made by politicians and orators regarding their own country's righteousness and the wrongdoings of other nations. Root's quote touches upon the phenomenon of nationalistic fervor and the practice of appealing to popular sentiment by portraying one's own country as virtuous and unquestionably right, while demonizing other nations as inherently wrong. This tendency is a recurring theme in political discourse and public opinion, and it often shapes attitudes and actions on both domestic and international levels.

Root's observation reflects the prevalence of nationalist rhetoric and the appeal of political and oratorical figures who capitalize on national pride and patriotism to gain popularity and support. This tactic often involves making exaggerated and extreme statements that portray one's own country as morally superior and infallible, while casting other countries as the enemy or as morally bankrupt. By playing into the emotions and biases of the audience, these politicians and orators seek to cultivate a sense of unity and solidarity among their supporters, often at the expense of nuance and critical reflection.

The phenomenon described by Root has been evident in various historical and contemporary contexts, as leaders and public figures use nationalist rhetoric to rally their supporters and advance their agendas. This approach can be particularly potent during times of conflict or tension, as it taps into deep-seated emotions and loyalties. By framing international relations and conflicts in black-and-white terms, these politicians and orators can effectively galvanize public opinion and garner support for their policies and actions.

However, the consequences of this popular tendency can be far-reaching and complex. By fostering an "us versus them" mentality, nationalist rhetoric can fuel animosity and distrust between nations, hindering efforts at diplomacy and peaceful resolution of conflicts. It can also perpetuate stereotypes and misconceptions about other cultures and peoples, ultimately contributing to a divisive and polarized global landscape.

Moreover, the uncritical acceptance of extreme statements and claims, as highlighted by Root, can undermine the public's ability to engage in reasoned debate and analysis of complex international issues. When individuals are swayed by emotional appeals and simplistic narratives, they may overlook the nuances and intricacies of geopolitical dynamics, thus hindering their capacity to make informed decisions as citizens and global actors.

In light of these implications, Root's quote serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and skepticism in the face of nationalist rhetoric and extreme political claims. It encourages individuals to question the narratives presented to them, to seek out diverse perspectives, and to approach international affairs with a nuanced understanding of the complexities involved.

In conclusion, Elihu Root's observation about the popular tendency to uncritically embrace extreme statements and claims made by politicians and orators reflects the enduring influence of nationalist rhetoric and the impact it can have on public opinion and international relations. By recognizing and interrogating this phenomenon, individuals can strive to engage in more thoughtful and informed discourse about their own country and its place in the world, as well as develop a deeper understanding of the complexities of global affairs.